-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 844
Remove Holly Worthen from 311 leadership page #8231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Holly Worthen from 311 leadership page #8231
Conversation
|
Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide! From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes. |
|
Availability: Mon-Fri after 6pm PST; Sat & Sun after 3PM PST. |
|
@FatCatLikesBeer Apologies but this is my first creating a pull request for hack4LA, are those the times that you can meet to review the pull request? If so, I can also meet tonight after 6pm |
|
Hi @edwarddim thanks for reaching out. We don't typically meet for pull reviews. Communication on issues, or feedback happen here in the comments section. The times are to let you and others know when I'm available to review your PR, and when to expect the feedback of my review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @edwarddim, thank you for taking on this issue!
Things Done Well
- Pull request is done with the correct branch
- Branch is properly named
- Issue is linked and understandable
- Appropriate changes made in the
Files changedtab - Before and after screen shots are included 👍🏽
- Website is still functional
- No spelling errors detected
Required Changes
- Check for CodeQL alerts and select the appropriate checkbox in your post
- Resolve merge conflict
When pulling your branch into my local fork, I was greeted with the following warning:
and when running a local instance of your branch, I don't see your changes:
My intuition is that since the file you edited,311-data.md, also has edits in commits ahead of yours, git is prioritizing the upstream changes instead of yours. Check out CONTRIBUTING.md, sections 2.7.d - 2.7.e or sections 3.1.c - 3.1.d for info on resolving this issue.
Once you made your changes, please reach out to me. I've updated my availability so I can approve your PR as soon as possible. Thank you for your hard work!
…update-project-profile-8015
…rddim/website into update-project-profile-8015
|
@FatCatLikesBeer Thank you for clarifying the pull request review, I really appreciate it! Also, just pulled the upstream branch and I think I am now ahead of gh-pages. I hope I've done it correctly. |
FatCatLikesBeer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@edwarddim Wow, what quick turn around time! Sorry for not getting back to you sooner!
Looks like you handled all the requested changes, thank you so much for your hard work!
I approve this PR!
|
Review ETA: 4 PM 7/3/25 Apologies for being the bottleneck! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👀 Visual Review
I’ve manually tested the frontend changes in the browser across multiple viewports:
- Do the changes address the issue? → Yes
- Are there unrelated changes? → No
- Do the changes negatively impact usability? → No
- Do links and components still work as expected? → Yes
💻 Code Review
I’ve reviewed the code changes:
- Could the code be further simplified? → No
- Are there areas that need additional comments or clarification? → No
- Are there any unrelated or drastic changes? → No
- Are any expected changes missing? → No
👍 Things done well
- Branch name includes the issue number and is descriptive
- PR references the related issue
- Includes screenshots
- Code is scoped and directly addresses the issue
I approve this PR. Thank you for contributing!
|
Nice one! Thanks for working on this. I have verified the changes are accurate and will now merge. 🎉 |
|
Hey @edwarddim @FatCatLikesBeer @eunicode If you need help with PR reviews, pulling branches, or anything else, feel free to Slack message me or the other Merge Team members and Dev Co-Leads. Thanks. |
Fixes #8015
What changes did you make?
Why did you make the changes (we will use this info to test)?
CodeQL Alerts
After the PR has been submitted and the resulting GitHub actions/checks have been completed, developers should check the PR for CodeQL alert annotations.
Check the PR's comments. If present on your PR, the CodeQL alert looks similar as shown
Please let us know that you have checked for CodeQL alerts. Please do not dismiss alerts.
Instructions for resolving CodeQL alerts
If CodeQL alert/annotations appear, refer to How to Resolve CodeQL alerts.
In general, CodeQL alerts should be resolved prior to PR reviews and merging
Visuals before changes are applied
Visuals after changes are applied